SonotaCo.JP
SonotaCo Network Japan Forum
SonotaCo.JP Forum Index
homeTop Page  FAQFAQ   検索検索   メンバーリストメンバーリスト   ユーザーグループユーザーグループ   登録する登録する 
 プロフィールプロフィール   プライベートメッセージをチェックするプライベートメッセージをチェックする   ログインログイン 

HI! I'm new here and i need advice...

 
新しいトピックを投稿   トピックに返信    SonotaCo.JP Forum Index -> UFOCapture BBS in English
前のトピックを表示 :: 次のトピックを表示  
投稿者 メッセージ
Ufoorb



登録日: 2016.03.19
記事: 6

記事日時: Sat Mar 19, 2016 10:09 am    記事の件名: HI! I'm new here and i need advice... 引用付きで返信

Hi,

I just want to know if Ufocapture work with IP CCTV camera like Hikvision (onfif) cam?

Is there,s a hardware compatibility list over here?

Thanks!



4pcs-lot-Hikvision-3MP-font-b-IP-b-font-font-b-camera-b-font-ds-2cd3132f.jpg
 説明:
 ファイルサイズ:  20.07 KB
 閲覧数:  20274 回

4pcs-lot-Hikvision-3MP-font-b-IP-b-font-font-b-camera-b-font-ds-2cd3132f.jpg


トップに戻る
ユーザーのプロフィールを表示  
SonotaCo
Site Admin


登録日: 2004.08.07
記事: 12644
所在地: 139.67E 35.65N

記事日時: Sat Mar 19, 2016 3:17 pm    記事の件名: Re: HI! I'm new here and i need advice... 引用付きで返信

Hi
UFOCapture requires the device driver of video input device that is compatible with Windows DirectShow un-compressed video capture interface.

As far as I know, there is no IP camera that provides such device driver,
so I think it is impossible to use IP cameras.

UFOCapture is used mostly with general video capture device that inputs standard video formats like below.
UFOCaptureV2:
NTSC 720X480/29.97fps, PAL 720x576/25.00fps.
UFOCaptureHD2:
HD 1920x1080/29.97i. 29.97p, 30.0i, 59.9p
UHD 3840x1080/29.97p

There are so many camera that uses these formats.
As an example of the capture device, BlackMagicDisign Intensity Pro 4k can handle all
format above through analog composite video signal, or digital HDMI video signal.

Sorry there is no compatibility list maintained. Devices are changing very rapidly on each country.

What are your target objects? If they are meteors, I recommend to use ultra high sensibity cameras like WATEC902H2U or Sony ILCE-7s (everybody uses those). Never select IPCameras or USB web cams, their sensitibity on the normal frame rate is very poor and not-compatible.
トップに戻る
ユーザーのプロフィールを表示  
Ufoorb



登録日: 2016.03.19
記事: 6

記事日時: Thu Mar 24, 2016 8:16 am    記事の件名: Thanks 引用付きで返信

Hi,
Thanks for your help....

Ok, so what about weather outside?
The Sony ILCE-7s and the WATEC902H2U or not IP66 or Ip67 for rain or snow?
Is there a way to put some of those outside?

I'm living in Quebec ,Canada winter= minus 38 c --- summer + 30 c

Thanks Question



img_5667.jpg
 説明:
 ファイルサイズ:  166.17 KB
 閲覧数:  20202 回

img_5667.jpg


トップに戻る
ユーザーのプロフィールを表示  
SonotaCo
Site Admin


登録日: 2004.08.07
記事: 12644
所在地: 139.67E 35.65N

記事日時: Fri Mar 25, 2016 3:24 pm    記事の件名: Re: Thanks 引用付きで返信

Ufoorb wrote:
I'm living in Quebec ,Canada winter= minus 38 c --- summer + 30 c:

Wow Shocked
It seems it is not easy. Below is an example of my station, sorry written in Japanese, just see figures, thouht it is -5 to 35 c.
http://sonotaco.jp/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3530 Shocked
トップに戻る
ユーザーのプロフィールを表示  
Ufoorb



登録日: 2016.03.19
記事: 6

記事日時: Mon Mar 28, 2016 11:55 am    記事の件名: Thanks! 引用付きで返信

Hi,
Thanks for your help...
As i see you use different convecter to send watec cam to your pc.

Look like the signal from the Watec camera is composite video....this type of signal is very low is quality no?

If you use a watec cam and the gv-usb2, what is the quality or resolution you get in your computer screen?

Why not using better resolution cam?
Does the low lux camera is the first think you should have?

Thanks?
Question Question
トップに戻る
ユーザーのプロフィールを表示  
Ufoorb



登録日: 2016.03.19
記事: 6

記事日時: Mon Mar 28, 2016 11:55 am    記事の件名: Thanks! 引用付きで返信

Hi,
Thanks for your help...
As i see you use different convecter to send watec cam to your pc.

Look like the signal from the Watec camera is composite video....this type of signal is very low is quality no?

If you use a watec cam and the gv-usb2, what is the quality or resolution you get in your computer screen?

Why not using better resolution cam?
Does the low lux camera is the first think you should have?

Thanks
トップに戻る
ユーザーのプロフィールを表示  
SonotaCo
Site Admin


登録日: 2004.08.07
記事: 12644
所在地: 139.67E 35.65N

記事日時: Mon Mar 28, 2016 4:02 pm    記事の件名: 引用付きで返信

Well it is the history.

SD (NTSC composite analog) 640x480 or 720x480/29.97 fps interlaced available at 2003, requires 2GHz single core processor UFOCaptureV2
HD 60i 1920x1080/29.97fps interlaced available at 2010 requires 2.0GHz x4 thread CPU, 200Mbyte/sec storage writing speed. UFOCaptureHD2
HD 60p 1920x1080/59.94fps progressive available at 2012 requires 3.0GHz x4 thread CPU, 400Mbyte/sec storage writing speed. UFOCaptureHD2
4K 30p 3820x2160/29.97fps progressive available at 2013 requires 4.0GHz cpu x8 thread. 800MByte/sec storage writing speed. UFOCaptureHD2

Yes, 4K camera is apparently the best, I recommend to use it for new projects, if the budget is enough.But still low cost SD system is far better than none.
But the ultra hi-sensitivity camera like watec902H2U or ILCE-7s is essential for meteor or TLE observation for all resolution. Usual sensitivity camera will capture almost none.
トップに戻る
ユーザーのプロフィールを表示  
Ufoorb



登録日: 2016.03.19
記事: 6

記事日時: Tue Mar 29, 2016 4:40 am    記事の件名: Hi again... 引用付きで返信

Thanks you for your fast answer....

What about this model?:http://www.ktncusa.com/750-tvl/700_tvl_box/box-camera

Color ~0.001 lux, B/W ~ 0.0001Lux/F=1.0 (Zero ghosting guaranteed)

KPC-BSP6300NU

This model is from KT&C....i think some older model was popular for a lot of people.
I'm trying to find a cam with low cost....i know...low cost = low quality...but the Watec is too expensive....

Thanks Question
トップに戻る
ユーザーのプロフィールを表示  
SonotaCo
Site Admin


登録日: 2004.08.07
記事: 12644
所在地: 139.67E 35.65N

記事日時: Tue Mar 29, 2016 8:05 am    記事の件名: Re: Hi again... 引用付きで返信

Ufoorb wrote:
Thanks you for your fast answer....

What about this model?:http://www.ktncusa.com/750-tvl/700_tvl_box/box-camera

Color ~0.001 lux, B/W ~ 0.0001Lux/F=1.0 (Zero ghosting guaranteed)

KPC-BSP6300NU

This model is from KT&C....i think some older model was popular for a lot of people.
I'm trying to find a cam with low cost....i know...low cost = low quality...but the Watec is too expensive....

Thanks Question


It is not clear.... There is not enough information on the page.
There are so many cameras that uses frame stacking or slow shutter to increase the sensitivity for the night. But it is not usable for mortion detection. I guess that this model is one of those.
トップに戻る
ユーザーのプロフィールを表示  
特定期間内の記事を表示:   
新しいトピックを投稿   トピックに返信    SonotaCo.JP Forum Index -> UFOCapture BBS in English All times are GMT + 9 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
移動先:  
新規投稿: 不可
返信投稿: 不可
記事編集: 不可
記事削除: 不可
投票参加: 不可
このフォーラムで添付ファイルを投稿 できません
このフォーラムでファイルをダウンロード できます


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Copyright ©2004 SonotaCo Network. All Rights Reserved.